Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
“Wife Should Not Be Made To Wait For Years Together, To Get Certain Amount Of Maintenance From The Hands Of The Husband”: Karnataka High Court
“Wife Should Not Be Made To Wait For Years Together, To Get Certain Amount Of Maintenance From The Hands Of The Husband”: Karnataka High Court
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 8th February, 2023 issuing directions to the lower courts to follow a timeline, while deciding ca

Inciting people at large against the Rule of Law and against one of the basic wings of the democratic setup, contempt proceedings initiated: Punjab High Court.
Inciting people at large against the Rule of Law and against one of the basic wings of the democratic setup, contempt proceedings initiated: Punjab High Court.
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Punjab High Court, in Court on its own motion v/s Union of India and others (CROCPNo.2of2023), delivered on 24th February, 2023, initiated cont

Kidney transplant upheld between not near relatives to prevent loss of life: Punjab High Court.
Kidney transplant upheld between not near relatives to prevent loss of life: Punjab High Court.
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Punjab High Court, on 6th December, 2022, in Ajay Mittal and others v/s Union of India and another (CWP NO.26361 OF 2022), upheld the petitions

The petitioners are factory producing two chemicals which effluents needed to be treated before discharging in the water. The petitioner partially treated the chemicals violating the law and the respondent issued notice for closure. The Court considered the notice is not disproportionate nor illegal: Andhra Pradesh High Court
The petitioners are factory producing two chemicals which effluents needed to be treated before discharging in the water. The petitioner partially treated the chemicals violating the law and the respondent issued notice for closure. The Court considered the notice is not disproportionate nor illegal: Andhra Pradesh High Court
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The A.P. High court issued an order on 23rd April, 1996 for judicial review of a notice in which the Court stated that the notice issued by the pol

Plant ten trees, take care of them for a decade: Delhi High Court while quashing FIR
Plant ten trees, take care of them for a decade: Delhi High Court while quashing FIR
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Delhi HC passed a order on 21st February, 2023. This was seen in the case of Latoori Singh & Ors v The State (NCT of Delhi) and ors. 1194/2

THERE IS NO MANDATE THAT AN OFFICER HAVING SUBSCRIBED TO A MOBILE NUMBER CARRIES THE NUMBER WHEREVER HE GOES : KERALA HIGH COURT
THERE IS NO MANDATE THAT AN OFFICER HAVING SUBSCRIBED TO A MOBILE NUMBER CARRIES THE NUMBER WHEREVER HE GOES : KERALA HIGH COURT
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgment on 3 February, 2023,stating there is no mandate that an officer having subscribed to a mobile number car

Delhi Waqf Board recruitment case: AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan, 10 others granted bail in CBI case
Delhi Waqf Board recruitment case: AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan, 10 others granted bail in CBI case
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Delhi HC passed a order on 1st march,2023. This was seen in the case of CBI vs Amanatullah Khan 53/2022 and the case was presided over by Hon&#

IT IS APODICTIC THAT DISTRIBUTION OF THE SRBF TO THE PERSONS ELIGIBLE WOULD CAUSE NO PREJUDICE EVEN TO THE SOCIETY; AND, IN FACT, THIS IS NOT OPPOSED BY THE GOVERNMENT EITHER :KERALA HIGH COURT
IT IS APODICTIC THAT DISTRIBUTION OF THE SRBF TO THE PERSONS ELIGIBLE WOULD CAUSE NO PREJUDICE EVEN TO THE SOCIETY; AND, IN FACT, THIS IS NOT OPPOSED BY THE GOVERNMENT EITHER :KERALA HIGH COURT
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgment on  11 January, 2023 ,stating it is apodictic that distribution of the SRBF to the persons eligible wou

The landmark judgment of the Indian Judiciary highlighting the importance of grave and sudden provocation, State of Maharashtra vs KM.Nanavati, 1961, Supreme Court of India, AIR 112, 1961 SCR(1) 497. The case of KM. Nanavati was the last case which was taken up for the trial of the jury. And ever since the case had been delivered the judgment the Government of India took steps towards abolishing the system of the jury and it has successfully abolished the same.
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: Sylvia was the wife of the petitioner KM. Nanavati and both wife and husband along with their children moved to Bombay. KM. Nana

The historic event of the programme of the reservation in the country India with the ruling of the Srimathi Champakam Case by the Supreme Court of India. (Supreme Court -1951) State of Madra vs Srimathi Champakam AIR 1951 SC 226. The directive from the government was held nullified and declared to be void by the Supreme Court in this judgment and this judgment differentiates the “Directive Principles of the state policy and the Fundamental Rights”.
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Facts of the Case: In the year 1950 in Madras, in a college there was an entrance for the students to get their seats in the college. There was a s